Can A Tv Show Be Registered As Trademarks

Mostly, the title to a single motility motion-picture show is non entitled to trademark protection.  This is the same for the title to single books, songs and other singular creative works.  Most non-trademark attorneys are surprised when I tell them this.  I am sure yous may be scratching your head as well.  The logic behind the legal principle that the title to a unmarried artistic piece of work cannot function as a trademark is as follows:  a title to a unmarried artistic piece of work such as a book serves to identify only the book and not the source of that volume.  Another reason trademark constabulary more often than not refuses to admit trademark rights in the title to a single creative piece of work, such every bit a volume, results from the interplay between copyright and trademark police force. While trademarks endure as long as the mark is used, copyrights somewhen expire. When a work falls into the public domain, others would have the correct to reproduce the literary piece of work.  Still, if the championship to the volume enjoyed trademark protection, this would compromise the policy of public domain nether copyright law because a book with a trademarked title could only be published under a unlike title.

Often the first question is whether the artistic work in question is, in fact, a unmarried creative piece of work.  A unmarried creative work is a form of work (i.eastward., volume, motion picture, record) in which the content does non change. Where the work is serialized, such as a telly series or the championship to periodically issued publications, trademark protection would be warranted.

Does this mean that titles to great works of literature such as Gone with the Current of air or the Cracking Gatsby are open up for apply past anyone?  Not necessarily.  While the USPTO may not let the championship of a single creative work to be registered, courts will grant protection where it is demonstrated that the title to the single artistic work has caused secondary meaning.  Secondary meaning (also referred to as acquired distinctiveness) happens where a mark acquires unique significance over time due to the trademark owner's usage, where the relevant public comes to associate the trademark with the source.  Establishing acquired distinctiveness is not an like shooting fish in a barrel chore.

While the USPTO will categorically turn down to register the title of a single creative work on the grounds that the championship fails to role as a trademark, a contempo Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB) decision shows that this position could exist softening.  Lining upwards with Federal Court doctrine, a 2016 not-precedential stance, the TTAB ended that the refusal to register as a trademark the title of a single work should be based on whether the title was distinctive and not due to the title failing to function equally a trademark.  In this example the TTAB found that the title of a single work should be registrable if an applicant can prove that the championship has caused distinctiveness.  This TTAB conclusion remains non-precedential and it is fairly sure that an bidder trying to register the title to a single creative work would encounter a refusal to register on the grounds that the proposed mark fails to function as a trademark.  All the same, if an applicant sought to annals the title to a well known single creative piece of work that has been publicly available for some fourth dimension and has been read, watched, viewed, or otherwise consumed by a substantial number of persons, that applicant may accept a chance (subsequently appeal to the TTAB) of achieving registration and reversing an established USPTO doctrine.

Can A Tv Show Be Registered As Trademarks,

Source: https://www.theiplawblog.com/2020/02/articles/ip/no-trademark-protection-in-book-or-movie-titles/

Posted by: hudsontanwas.blogspot.com

Share this post